Yea, like China, Australia, Russia and guess what, the USA. SA too.
And here is a tidbit on non-whites birthrate outpacing white birthrates: Everywhere whites “intervened” non-white births have increased immensely.
Flipside: White birthrates have been declining the richer the country gets. That is due to living costs increasing exponentially and as a direct result, the increased cost of having children/bringing them to adulthood. Unintended consequence or planned?
Where they got it wrong, a couple of reasons I picked up, and it is not an exhaustive list at all::
It starts off with whites wanting the resources that are in a non-white country with resultant corruption/bribes/war to get it.
Over time the populace gets poorer and poorer due to corruption/famine/war until the whites start “helping” the poor. This is a problem. Anything given/taken for free never ever works out well for the receiver over extended periods of time, ever. Teach people to fish as they say. Better yet, get out of their countries.
Then you have mother nature: When you live in constant hunger/fear/war/famine, birthrates escalate to ensure survival. Couple that with the above, and you have a serious problem.
So yea, if non-white countries did not need the resources/opulence they insist on having and left the countries that had those “required” resources well alone, the world would have looked quite differently today.
The Middle East/South America/Africa to name but a few.