In life saying never is a dangerous, one n3ver knows what you may have to do to survive. If your friends and family have the item you need to survive great but, shit happens and ammo is a easy trade medium in troubled times. Imagine you need some life saving drug that no one in your group has but gang in neighbourhood does, the trade medium is tangible goods that you can’t spare like food but you do have some ammo of a calibre you don’t use but they do, what do you decide to do?
Does this make the gang more dangerous to you, somewhat, are you ok with letting someone die by either not getting meds or by starving due to the no trade ammo rule. Making a preconceived choice now in ti.e of plenty is a slippery path to decisions that will haunt you for rest of your life. Moral high ground is empty house with a full graveyard full of tears and regrets. Ask yourself is any rule it truely something you are willing to let your loved ones die for and you live with, those few things that are that important to both the person willing to die and one to live with the burden of that choice is a set thing everything else is negotiable. It’s easy to say I would die for that, what would you live through sending your loved ones to die for?