4 dead, including shooter, during attack at Gilroy Garlic Festival

Home Forums News & Current Events 4 dead, including shooter, during attack at Gilroy Garlic Festival

This topic contains 6 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  Crow Bar 10 months, 2 weeks ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #21184

    Crow Bar
    Keymaster
  • #21185

    Crow Bar
    Keymaster
  • #21209

    Tolik
    Participant

    Wow , and they have such strict gun console , I see how well thats working .

  • #21226

    Crow Bar
    Keymaster

    I am looking at this from a variety of view points.

    The LEO were counting on the fence to keep people out and as perimeter security. Were they having random patrols check the fence area?

    Would this be considered a gun free zone? Could the argument be made as a gun free zone, no CCW, effectively rendered all the attendees defenseless? Could a CCW carrier have engaged and neutralized the shooter before the shooter could have killed/injured more after the first shot?

  • #21265

    Whirlibird
    Participant

    <p style=”text-align: left;”>LE had him down in around a minute, there was a heavy presence. And they went against a rifle with just handguns.</p>
    CCW? Hard to say but I will say that unless I was in his immediate area and could not remove myself from the situation, I would only then engage.

    And I advise as such to my classes.

    As a CCW holder, you don’t have any gear but your pistol and minimal ammunition. No comms, no intel, no armor, no backup. What happened to the good samaritan in Vegas (Target)?

    During the Mumbai attack, what did the SAS gent do? He was armed (pistol). He did not engage but led others to safety and returned for more. But he stayed out of the fight.

    In this case, it’s Cali, CCW is essentially non-existent. And since its a gun free zone, you wouldn’t be likely to be armed anyway. You pull that pistol and responding LE are probably going to assume that you are involved and if you are lucky, just arrest you while the bad guy continues.

    To give some perspective, we had an incident at an elementary school some years back. I was first on scene and as I ran up to the building to get an initial look, a parent came out and was grabbing a shotgun out of his pickup. After a few rude words, I informed him in no gentle terms that about 6 officers were making entry from as many doors around the school and anyone that wasn’t wearing a badge and had a gun was getting shot and that he would probably bleed out before we considered calling the ambulance in.

    LE training has changed thanks to Columbine. Priority one is to stop the killing, even if it means stepping over the injured and dying. And anyone with a gun is a suspect.

    Basically, if you can’t back shoot this bad guy and put your gun down and wait for the cavalry, stay out of it.

  • #21267

    Tolik
    Participant

    The thing about gun free zones , is that like all the rest of that crap , only effects LAW ABIDING citizens . Another thing is , that even if it was not a gun free zone , the vast majority of people don’t CCW , even if it was allowed . So both arguments in theory work , but in practice , both arguments actually fail .

  • #21289

    Crow Bar
    Keymaster

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Skip to toolbar